A Moral Amoralist & Amoral Moralist

Contrary to popular conception, Niccolò Machiavelli’s advisory precepts are not  immoral in intention. All prescriptive arguments are ought statements and as such fall, by definition, under the rubric of ethical argument. Machiavelli’s prescriptions are recommended means toward the most ethically desirable outcome for what in contemporary parlance we’d term the end user.

Whether the precepts contained in the his works do indeed lead to this goal or whether that end itself is desirable for the larger community are matters for analysis. Yet those critiques do not invalidate the essential aim of the Prince as a treatise in the service of an outcome–an outcome that Machiavelli would have considered to be morally correct.

A. Darius Kamali


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.