etymological problem in epistemology (and an immodest solution)

In philosophy of mind, there are two bedrock episto-ontological theories:

Idealism (which posits that the material universe cannot be distinguished from, and therefore cannot be proven to exist separate from mental qualia–al la Bishop Berkeley)

 

 

and it’s opposite philosophical theory of knowledge: Materialism (which argues that mental phenomenon such as mind/consciousness are in fact reducible to matter and hence explainable through the laws of biology, chemistry and ultimately physics–a la David Hume.)

 

As it turns out, both of these terms have long been entirely misappropriated by the lay public.  In the common parlance, the word idealism has come to mean a wishful, utopian aspiration. While materialism is now broadly associated with its related but distinct Marxian critique and theory, further popularized and debased as a type of all consuming, well–consumerism.

 

 

 

As a solution, I suggest that the philosophical profession disambiguate the meanings of these seminal theories of knowledge from their near universally accepted popular corruptions– by renaming both.

My modest proposal:

Idealism to Ideaism and

Materialism to Matterism.

A. Darius Kamali

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.